DOWNLOAD FULL SHOW HERE
http://www.mediafire.com/?2najdtengno
FEBRUARY 4, 2009
THE SAVAGE NATION VERSUS THE CHINESE SCREEN
YESTERDAY, THE VICTORY FOR THE SAVAGE NATION WAS TOM DASCHLE WITHDRAWING HIS NAME FROM CONSIDERATION AS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SECRETARY. TODAY BRINGS US ANOTHER VICTORY. THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES IS PREPARING TO CANCEL ITS CONTRACT TO PURCHASE A CHINESE MADE X-RAY SCREENING SYSTEM. THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT I, MICHAEL SAVAGE BROUGHT UP MONTHS AGO.
I TOLD YOU THAT HAVING AN X-RAY CREENING SYSTEM THAT WAS MADE IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA SITTING IN THE LARGEST PORT ON THE WEST COAST COULD SERIOUSLY THREATEN OUR NATIONAL SECURITY. THERE WAS NO WAY OF FINDING OUT IF THE CHINESE HAD PUT A BACK DOOR SPYING SYSTEM INTO THE MACHINERY OR CREATED A WAY OF CIRCUMVENTING THE SYSTEM SO THAT A WEAPON COULD SNEAK THROUGH. IT WOULD ALSON HAVE OUTSOURCED CRITICAL MANUFACTURING JOBS THAT NEEDED TO STAY IN THE UNITED STATES. IN SPITE OF THIS, FOR A LONG TIME IT SEEMED AS IF THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES WAS GOING TO DEFY ALL LOGIC AND PURCHASE THE SYSTEM ANYWAY.
BUT NOW IT HAS BEEN REPORTED, NOT BY THE LA TIMES OR THE MAJOR LIBERAL MEDIA, BUT BY GOVERNMENT SECURITY NEWS, WHO WE’LL BE TALKING TO IN A FEW MOMEMNTS, THAT THE PORT STAFF HAS RECCOMMENDED TO THE HARBOR COMMISSIONERS THAT THE CHINESE MANUFACTURER BE DECLARED IN DEFAULT OF THEIR CONTRACT. THEY RECCOMMENED THE CONTRACT BE CANCELLED BECAUSE THE SCREENING SYSTEM DOESN’T MEET MAUNFACTURING STANDARDS. THEY RECCOMMENED IT BECAUSE IT DIDN’T OPERATE AS IT SAID IT WOULD. AND THEY RECCOMMENED IT BECAUSE THE COMPANY HAS NOT PROVIDED SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION OR OPERATIONA CHECKLISTS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUANGE. BUT THE REAL REASON SHOULD HAVE BEEN THAT WE WERE OPENING OURSELVES TO A POSSIBLE ATTACK. JUST AS WITH THE DUBAI PORTS FIASCO, WE WERE PUTTING OUR VITAL NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS IN THE HANDS OF A FOREIGN POWER. AND JUST AS WITH THE DUBAI PORTS FIASCO, IT HAS BEEN STOPPED BY THE SAVAGE NATION.
OBAMA SELLS OUT AMERICA
AN INTERESTING IN THE LOS ANGELES TIMES THE OTHER DAY. THE AUTHOR WAS TRYING TO DISPROVE THE IDEA THAT ILLEGAL ALIENS WERE A DRAIN ON THE ECONOMY IN CALIFORNIA. BUT THE INTERESTING THING ABOUT THE ARTICLE WAS THIS, EVEN IF YOU USE THE DELIBERATELY LOWBALL NUMBERS HE EMPLOYS TO TALK ABOUT HOW MUCH ILLEGAL ALIENS COST BOTH THE SATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE UNITED STATES, IT’S CLEARLY AN ENORMOUS PROBLEM.
THE LIBERAL LA TIMES SAYS CALIFORNIA SPENDS ALMOST A BILLION DOLLARS ON ILLEGAL ALIENS IN PRISON. IT SAYS CALIFORNIA SPENDS HALF A BILLION DOLLARS ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGAL’S. IT SAYS CALIFORNIA SPENDS THREE QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS ON HEALTHCARE FOR ILLEGAL’S. AND EVEN THE FAR LEFT LOS ANGELES TIMES SAYS CALIFORNIA SPENDS FOUR BILLION DOLLARS ON EDUCATION FOR THE CHILDREN OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. IF EVEN THIS OUTLET OF THE GOVERNMENT MEDIA COMPLEX IS WILLING TO ADMIT TO A MORE THAN SIX BILLION DOLLAR PRICE TAG FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS, WHAT DO YOU THINK THE REAL COST IS?
EVEN THE LA TIMES ADMITS THEY ARE A DRAIN ON THE BUDGET. BUT IF WE THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT MOST LIBERAL TEACHERS REFUSE TO ASK STUDENTS IF THEY ARE ILLEGAL ALIENS. IF WE THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE PRISON SYSTEM PROBABLY UNDERESTIMATES THE PERCENTAGE OF PRISONERS WHO ARE ILLEGAL ALIENS. IF WE THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT MOST HOSPITALS WILL NOT ASK, AND ARE IN FACT FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO ASK ABOUT THE LEGAL STATUS OF PEOPLE WHO COME INTO THE EMERGENCY ROOM. IF WE TAKE ALL OF THESE THINGS INTO CONSIDERATION, THEN WE CAN PROBABLY ASSUME THAT THE ACTUAL COST OF ILLEGAL ALIENS IS THREE TO FOUR TIMES GREATER THAN THE LIBERALS WILL ADMIT THAT IT IS. AND CALIFORNIA IS JUST ONE STATE. THIS IS A NATIONAL PROBLEM, THIS IS A NATIONAL EMERGENCY. OBAMA SHOULD NOT BE GIVING MORE MONEY TO ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THE FORM OF A STIMULUS PACKAGE. HE SHOULD BE DEPORTING THEM FROM THE COUNTRY SO THAT WE DON’T NEED A STIMULUS AT ALL.
 Protect freedom of speech! Support the Savage Legal Fund. | ||
| ||
| Donations Are Not Tax Deductible |
No comments:
Post a Comment