DOWNLOAD FULL SHOW HERE
http://www.mediafire.com/?2zomzz4nyno
FEBRUARY 19, 2009
LIBERALISM AND THE CHIMP PART 2
THE STORY OF THE CHIMPANZEE WHO MAULED AND ALMOST KILLED A HUMAN BEING GETS CURIOUSER AND CURIOUSER. YESTERDAY WE FOUND OUT THAT THE CHIMPS OWNER, SANDRA HAROLD, FED HIM WINE, ICE CREAM, AND POSSIBLY THE DRUG XANAX. WE FOUND OUT THAT SHE SNUGGLED WITH HIM AT NIGHT. TODAY MORE DETAILS HAVE COME OUT. SHE FED HIM FILLET MIGNON AND LOBSTER TAILS. THEY BATHED TOGETHER.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT FAR TRANSCENDED THE BOUNDS OF ANY NORMAL HUMAN-ANIMAL RELATIONSHIP. EVEN HER FRIENDS SAID THEY WERE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH HOW THE RELATIONSHIP HAD DEVELOPED. AND THOUGH PSYCHIATRISTS CLAIM A RELATIONSHIP WITH AN ANIMAL CAN OFTEN TAKE THE PLACE OF A HUMAN, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT CROSSES ALL BOUNDARIES. THIS IS THE MENTAL DISORDER OF LIBERALISM GOVE VIOLENTLY AND TRAGICALLY WRONG. CLEARLY THIS WOMAN HAD ISSUES. SHE PREFERRED THE COMPANY OF A CHIMPANZEE TO THE COMPANY OF A HUMAN BEING. SHE TREATED HIM AS IF HE WERE A HUMAN BEING. THAT WAS ONE FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKE.
WILD ANIMALS ARE UNPREDICTABLE, THEY CAN SNAP IN A SECOND FOR REASONS HUMAN BEINGS CANT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS CLEARLY WHAT HAPPENED HERE. FURTHER MORE, IN ADDITION TO THE BIZARRE FORMS OF AFFECTION SHE LAVISHED ON THIS ANIMAL, WHICH IN THE TWISTED MIND OF SOME LIBERALS COULD BE SEEN AS ACCEPTABLE, THE FRIENDS AROUND HER, EVEN THOUGH THEY SAW IT AS A DISTURBING RELATIONSHIP APPARENTLY WERE WILLING TO DO NOTHING. IF ONE OF HER FRIENDS WOULD HAVE INTERVENED AND SAID TO THIS WOMAN “I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU NEED FRIENDSHIP BUT THIS IS WRONG, THIS HAS GONE TOO FAR, THIS IS IMMORAL” THEN THIS TRAGEDY MIGHT HAVE BEEN AVERTED. BUT BECAUSE OF THE LIBERAL DOGMA THAT SAYS “IF IT FEELS GOOD, DO IT” AND THAT REJECTS ANY ATTEMPT TO STAND IN THE WAY OF EVEN THE MOST DEGENERATE PLEASURE THAT SOMEONE MIGHT WANT TO PARTAKE IN, NO ONE APPARENTLY SPOKE UP. AND IT IS THAT ENVIRONMENT THAT SEEMS TO HAVE PRECIPITATED THIS HORRIBLE EVENT.
SAVAGE JOINS WITH THOMAS MORE
THE CENSORS OF THE LEFT HAVE A NEW ALLIANCE AGAINST THEM. I, MICHAEL SAVAGE, HAVE JOINED WITH THE THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER TO FIGHT ANY ATTEMPT THAT THE NEO-MARXISTS IN CONGRESS MAY MAKE TO IMPOSE THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE. NOW, YOU’VE HEARD OF THE THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER BEOFRE. THEY’VE BEEN ON MY PROGRAM MANY TIMES. THEY DEFENDED LT. COL. CHESSANI IN THE HADITHA CASE. AND NOW THEY’RE STANDING UP FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
BOTH MICHAEL SAVAGE AND THE THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT LIBERALISM USED TO BE AND THE NEO MARXISM THAT IT HAS BECOME IN THIS DAY AND AGE. WE UNDERSTAND THAT DESPITE ALL THE CLAIMS OF THE LIBERALS THAT THEY JUST WANT “BALANCE,” THAT THEY JUST WANT “FAIRNESS” THAT WHAT IS BEHIND THIS EFFORT IS A DESIRE FOR CENSORSHIP PURE AND SIMPLE. THEY WANT TO SQUELCH DISSENTING VOICES. AND THE ONLY WAY TO STOP THIS IS WITH IMMEDIATE, DECISIVE ACTION. WAITING UNTILO THE ENE,MY IS AT OUR GATES. DEMANDING THAT WE BE KICKED OFF THE AIR IS NOT ENOUGH. BY THEN IT WILL BE TOO LATE. THE TIME TO SPEAK UP IS NOW.
BECAUSE IN SPITE OF YEARS OF DEGENERACY, DESPITE ALL THE BRAINWASHING OF THE LIBERAL MEDIA, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE STILL UNDERSTAND THE WORDS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS, THAT TO SUPPRESS THE OPPOSING POINT OF VIEW IS FUNDAMENTALLY UN-AMERICAN. AND THEY UNDERSTAND TECHNOLOGICALLY IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SUPPRESS DISSENTING THOUGHTS. IF YOU SUPPRESS THE MEDIUM OF TELEVISION, THOUGHTS TURN UP ON RADIO. IF YOU SUPPRESS THE MEDIUM OF RADIO, THE SAME THOUGHTS TURN UP ON THE INTERNET. THERE ARE TOO MANY OUTLETS FOR THEM TO CONTROL. WE NO LONGER LIVE IN AN ERA IN WHICH TWO OR THREE MONOLITHIC T V NETWORKS DECIDE ALL OPINION. AND YET THE LIBERALS WOULD LIKE TO BELIEVE THAT WE STILL DO. MICHAEL SAVAGE AND THE THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER WILL TEACH THEM OTHERWISE.
 Protect freedom of speech! Support the Savage Legal Fund. | ||
| ||
| Donations Are Not Tax Deductible |
No comments:
Post a Comment